After that the same shots upsized to 1920p and the same shots with Sharpen filter added (value 20). No sharpening, no luma noise reduction (color 25, default setting).Įxported as JPG, imported in Premiere as Image Sequence.įirst shots show original crops. No oder edits, only tried to match white balance.Ĭanon EOS 5D Mark II 1880x840p (max width)ĭNG's processed in ACR. This is especially concerning when you can capture dynamic range with a smaller codec on cameras like the Sony A7S with Slog. The first shots (5D and 5DII) both are brightened + 1 stop in ACR. Answer (1 of 3): My issue with 5D Magic Lantern raw, and raw of any kind, is the amount of data it takes to capture it.

The 5D Mark II was set at iso 6400 for f/16 and 100 for f/2.8, 50D should have used about the same values, but it was calculating them.Ĥ. Changed distance to object with 50D to compensate for cropfactor.ģ. Flickering in 50D footage is caused by turning off exposure simulation in cameraĢ. Julian over on the Magic Lantern forum has been posting some of his video tests with the 50D, here is a new comparison with the Mark II, with some notes from Julian about the test:ġ. If you've been looking for a cheaper used camera to play around with RAW video (or you happen to have one of these sitting around), the Canon 50D and the full-frame Canon 5D Mark II are both great options (and both are from 2008), but how do they compare against each other? Not only is it getting more stable every day, but they've managed to get a camera that never shot video at all - the Canon 50D - giving us beautiful RAW video. It is absolutely incredible how far the Magic Lantern RAW video hack has come in such a short amount of time.

Magic lantern canon 5d mark ii raw size